Look at that: I got a bunch of views
and some of them are not even my own nor the ones I paid for either.
And what is that ... a comment … a
NICE comment? Well of course it is .. 'cause it's from my dear
friend Pam.
I also got a couple of direct emails
asking questions and making suggestions and you will all get your
answers soon. However, while I appreciate the emails, I would
strongly suggest in the future go to the comments section .. let
your hair down and go to bat with me in public .. I won't bite. .
unless you want me to.
While Pam's questions are quite
interesting, and I promise I will answer them in the next entry,
today I want to focus on something else:
The CBA negotiations.
Yes, I know, boring subject, everybody
is covering it , not much to say about it that hasn't already been
said in a thousand +1 places all over the interwebs and printed media
( well in Canada that is, cause in US there is no such thing as
printed Hockey media in most places).
What does this CBA stand for?
Collective Bargaining Agreement some would say.. right? Well … I
think they got the “Collective” part covered , now with Fehr
involving as many players as he can and the great Commish doing his
thing with the owners club but …. umm where is the bargaining? They
keep meeting for a coffee and scones and then they break off
“negotiations” to run tell the “Collective” how there is no
progress and the gulf between them is filled with rocks, nuclear
submarines with death dealing torpedoes and Megalodons and there's no
way on crossing it.
We have all been involved in
“bargaining” one way or another. A Farmer's market, a fake Rolex
vendor, a car dealer. It can be a lengthy process. Bargaining with
the car dealer can take many consecutive hours and that is just ONE
item to settle: the car price. These people have dozens of things to
settle on yet they can't seem to sit at a table together longer than
it takes some people to get a smoke break at the office. What exactly
do they plan to accomplish in a coffee break? And why do they spend
more time doing the silly PR war with the media than they do actually
negotiating?
Today they met for 45 mins
already..then they ran away to chat it out with the “collective”.
There is no consensus on what has been discussed but I doubt they
managed to hash out a lot more than what creamer is best to use on a
bourbon toffee flavored coffee. The good news is they said they will
be back to the negotiating table today .. probably just in time for
the 5 o'clock tea and biscuits.
Shall we take a look at what people
think at the major issues they can't agree on? If my understanding of
the economics involved ( and I am horrible at it so if I am wrong
please do point out to me where I am mistaken) is correct, one of the issues is
something to do with who pays who for the money lost by the teams
with financial problems .. more or less. Well .. my first question
would be: why are there teams with financial problems? Is it that
some cities can't sustain a hockey team, as some ancient alien
theorist suggest? Well why are there teams in cities than can't
sustain hockey, you ask? Because NHL expanded. And how did it expand?
Well they voted on it .. who voted on it you ask? The existing
owners.
AHA .. so there you are . This is who
should pay for the teams that lose money: the teams who make money.
Or do the sensible thing and cut the teams that lose money and cry
for it. Problem solved .. next item on the agenda …
oh wait .. what is that .. owners still
crying about cap being too high and salaries being exorbitant ? Well
you wanted a cap , you set the amount, you set the annual increase
limit on that cap .. what's the problem? And don't get me into the
whole high salaries thing .. who gave away those contracts? Was it
Jesus?
Other items in dispute are contract
lengths, duration till UFA etc. I guess the owners are crying that
they need more return for their “investment” in their draftees. I
guess they have a point .. I mean think about all the investment that
went into sucking balls for a year or two so that you get the best
chance of winning the draft lottery and pick whoever the draft
central considers the top graduate of that year's prospect class .
Hard work I tell ya.
But .. how about that “prospect”
who dreamed of being a Wing or a Ranger, or even a Shark .. only to
be drafted by … the Islanders? Or the Oilers? I mean I am 18 yr'
old , better than all other teenagers in the draft and I worked
really hard at it and now you tell me I have to move to Edmonton out
of all places, for the entire length of my effective youth? That is Alberta! What is there to do for a vibrant 18
yr old in that place?
And the list of issue goes on. It's a
hard list, I do admit .. but ultimately, ladies and gentlemen, let's
look at the facts: hockey has never been as popular in US and the
world as it is now. The NHL as a league is growing, the players ,
well some of them anyway, are seeing more money than at any time ever
in the history of the league. Why ruin it now with a lockout?
Well because we, the fans, proved we
are suckers and will come back in drones making the owners and the
players richer in the process while our pockets are getting emptier
and ( now I am getting into another sore issues I have) the actual
hockey product is getting worse ( but that is for another day).
Our great Commish put it publicly : we
are the best fans in the world. And while it was a PR stunt .. he is
right. We forgive and forget and they can afford to take smoke breaks
instead of negotiation sessions. We close our eyes and hug them
blindly, that is why they can screw around for a year of lockout.
They have the time cause we give them our patience, they have the
money cause.. well we gave them that, so for the most part neither
owners nor players are really motivated to get anything done in time
for the season.
Now some will say: how about the
bottom end players, the ones that do not make a gazillion just to
sign a piece of papers because their last name is Parise? Well I
don't know how to put this but even they make enough to be able to
save for rainy days plus they have the PA for which they payed
monthly .. right? Trust me .. they will all survive.
And so will I .. I am a hockey fan
first and foremost. And there is a lot of hockey around. AHL season
will go on and you can go watch your local team if you have it or
find web streams on top of whatever they will show on NHL network.
There are also links, if you know where to look, with excellent
European hockey ( SEL, KHL etc). In Canada they are covered for live
hockey as well but even in US there's hockey to be seen live. For
example San Francisco just got a brand new ECHL team: The Bulls
(http://sfbulls.com/) . There's
also college hockey and various other minor leagues. Great hockey
everywhere you look.
What does that mean?
If the fools at the negotiating table
don't get their panties straighten out, I will be sad the Sharks are
locked out and I can't watch Marleau blinking wildly while shying
away from contact but I will get my hockey fix one way or another.
So bring it on NHL and NHLPA .. lock
yourself out .. I will be said but I won't cry.
Now I was suggested to end my blogs
with some witty one-liner the way some bloggers do but I have a
problem with that .. see Camelia Gore , the Sharks “blogger” for
hockeybuzz ends his rants with something along the lines of “keep
your stick on the ice”, Well I prefer to keep mine in my pants
cause I am sure nobody wants to see it .. and no offense Cammer ..
but the ice is damn cold .. not good for stick size.
Here's to hoping they find common
ground and the season is saved ..
CIAO
more niemi bashing less captain blinky! Good stuff pimp.
ReplyDeleteNo worries.. they will all get their turn ...
ReplyDeleteAnd that was not bashing .. just a love tap :)
The main argument for keeping the teams that lose money in the league is that the other teams need somebody to play against. It is good for the league to have many teams as no one wants to see the same team 10 times a year and the owners want to have as many games as possible. There should be more profit sharing in the league if the owners want to make the competition interesting and keep interest in the sport high.
ReplyDeleteI think the Sharks as a team are losing money, but the owners still want them here because they still make a net profit with being able to rent out the arena to other events.
So then the teams that make money should just share the bounty and shut the hell up, not cry to players and expect them to "pay" through salary cuts and whatnot :)
DeleteAnd while the Sharks "lose money" on hockey operations, SVSE doesn't .. so it's all good for the owners .. why do you think they are so chill about the whole thing :)